Liked that the post left some questions open rather than pretending to settle everything, and a stop at pncdhs1 continued that intellectual honesty, content that respects the limits of its own claims is more trustworthy than content that overreaches and this site has clearly figured out which positions it can defend confidently.
Now recognising the editorial wisdom of letting some questions remain open at the end, and a look at pncdhs1 continued that intellectual honesty, content that does not force closure on contested questions is content that respects the limits of knowledge and this site has clearly developed the maturity to know when to leave space.
