I usually skim posts like these but this one held my attention all the way through, and a stop at intentionaldesign did the same, that is a strong endorsement coming from me because I am usually quick to bounce when content gets repetitive or fails to deliver on its initial promise made in the headline.
A piece that reads as if the writer trusted readers to fill in obvious gaps, and a look at intentionaldesign continued that respectful approach, content that does not over explain what the reader can infer is content that respects intelligence and this site has clearly chosen to write to capable readers rather than to the lowest common denominator.
