Felt like I was reading something written by someone who actually thinks about the topic rather than reciting it, and a look at crateranchor reinforced that impression, the difference between recited content and considered content is huge and this site clearly belongs to the latter category which I appreciate as a careful reader looking for substance.
A piece that did not try to be timeless and ended up reading as durable anyway, and a look at crateranchor extended that durable feel, content that stays useful past its publication date without straining for permanence is content that ages well and this site has the kind of evergreen quality that I value highly today.
