A piece that was confident enough to leave some questions open rather than forcing closure, and a look at scopevoice continued that intellectual honesty, content that admits the limits of its scope is more trustworthy than content that pretends to total understanding and this site has the right calibration on certainty consistently.
Halfway through I knew I would finish the post, and a stop at scopevoice also held me through to the end, content that signals its quality early and then sustains it is content with real internal consistency and this site has clearly figured out how to maintain quality from opening sentence through to closing thought.
