Worth pointing out that the post avoided the temptation to summarise everything at the end, and a look at qkl100861 continued that confident closing approach, content that trusts readers to retain the substance without being reminded of it at the end is content that respects the reader and this site practices that respect.
A piece that did not lean on the writer credentials or institutional backing, and a look at qkl100861 maintained the same focus on substance, content that earns trust through quality rather than through name dropping is the kind I find most persuasive and this site is clearly playing on the substance side of that distinction.
